Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!charon!piring.cwi.nl!lambert
From: lambert@piring.cwi.nl (Lambert Meertens)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: SCI.philosophy.objectivism
Message-ID: <8783@boring.cwi.nl>
Date: 9 Feb 90 04:56:26 GMT
References: <CMM.0.88.633891635.bfu@skakke.uio.no> <11909@goofy.megatest.UUCP> <7434@tank.uchicago.edu>
Sender: news@cwi.nl (The Daily Dross)
Reply-To: lambert@cwi.nl (Lambert Meertens)
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 17
Sender:

From article <9002062327.AA11371@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>:
)         She also noted a difference in choice of topics: Mac students write
) about fast food, dating, the idiot box etc., PC students write about capital
) punishment, teenage pregnancy, nuclear war.

In article <7434@tank.uchicago.edu> rwt1@tank.uchicago.edu (Robert Tracinski)
writes:
)                      Sci.philosophy.objectivism is not being proposed because
) some people think it might be "fun" to talk about "what's wrong with 
) Objectivism".  It is being proposed to provide a place for serious discussion 
) about technical aspects of the philosophy of Objectivism.

Can't we make it mandatory that contributions to SPO are posted from a PC?

-- 

--Lambert Meertens, CWI, Amsterdam; lambert@cwi.nl