Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen
From: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: rec.arts.erotica - call for votes
Message-ID: <2117@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Date: 9 Feb 90 23:08:07 GMT
References: <25CBBFBB.4E27@telly.on.ca> <730@banyan.UUCP>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corp R&D Center, Schenectady NY
Lines: 11

In article <730@banyan.UUCP> tim@banyan.UUCP (Tim Henrion@Eng@Banyan) writes:

| I am not against the creation of this group, I just believe
| alt.sex.erotica is a better place for it.

  "Not in my backyard," right? I don't think that this group will be
particularly offensive to most people. They (a) don't have to read it,
and (b) would have to unrot articles which are explicit.
-- 
bill davidsen	(davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen)
            "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me