Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!lewis.crd.ge.com!welty
From: welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for Discussion:  rec.radio.misc
Message-ID: <2843671299@lewis.crd.ge.com>
Date: 10 Feb 90 20:41:39 GMT
References: <8970@stiatl.UUCP> <38496@apple.Apple.COM>
Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com
Reply-To: welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty)
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: New York State Institute for Sebastian Cabot Studies
Lines: 23

In article <38496@apple.Apple.COM>, Chuq Von Rospach writes: 
*meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) writes:

*>Have we? I haven't seen a consensus (unless apparent lack of interest
*>is a concensus, which I suppose it is, after a fashion).

*lack of controversy implies either consensus or nobody caring. Only a vote
*will define which of the two possibilities is true.

i think that at this time, the advocates of the non-commerical
radio group should decide whether or not they want to call for
a vote on their proposal, either 1) running a vote or 2) letting
us know so that i can contemplate starting a vote on rec.radio.misc

i won't be in a position to call for the rec.radio.misc vote for
two weeks, so there's plenty of time for the non-comm advocates
to decide which way they want to go.

richard
-- 
richard welty    518-387-6346, GE R&D, K1-5C39, Niskayuna, New York
welty@lewis.crd.ge.com            ...!crdgw1!lewis.crd.ge.com!welty            
   ``gee, you can hardly tell where the cat slept on the cake''