Xref: utzoo rec.aquaria:417 sci.aquaria:399 alt.aquaria:6040 news.groups:17659
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!snorkelwacker!apple!agate!stew.ssl.berkeley.edu!link
From: link@stew.ssl.berkeley.edu (Richard Link)
Newsgroups: rec.aquaria,sci.aquaria,alt.aquaria,news.groups
Subject: Re: sci.aquaria.birdfeed (was: Guppies)
Message-ID: <1990Feb12.091942.9791@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 12 Feb 90 09:19:42 GMT
References: <##701$@rpi.edu> <10804@saturn.ADS.COM>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 19

In article <10804@saturn.ADS.COM> xanthian@saturn.ADS.COM (Metafont Consultant Account) writes:
>I think we can kill several aviforms with one lithoform here.
>
>This  will  associate some birds with an
>aquarium,  allowing  the  recent  condemnation    of  sci.aviary to be
>sidetracked into  an   expansion  of  the  fastest  growing  redundant
>newsgroup lowarchy on the net,  *.aquaria[.*].

OK. Now I *know* there are others who share my opinion.
Rec.aquaria suffices.

I'm sick of cross postings, Let's spare the taxpayers (remember them?)
the cost, and me the time, of these unnecessary duplications in 3
newsgroups. Consider the traffic in *.aquaria.*. compared to 
rec.music.*, where the latter * is *any* single newsgroup.

Richard Link, Ph.D.
Space Sciences Laboratory
University of California, Berkeley