Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ketch.cis.ohio-state.edu!martens
From: martens@ketch.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: CfD: Interest Groups Surveys
Message-ID: <77031@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 13 Feb 90 02:51:11 GMT
References: <22196.25d2eed0@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <Y0O1NG5xds13@ficc.uu.net> <22212.25d6c149@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Reply-To: Jeff Martens <martens@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: Ohio State University Computer and Information Science
Lines: 17

In article <22212.25d6c149@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> sloane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>In article <Y0O1NG5xds13@ficc.uu.net>, peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>> In article <22196.25d2eed0@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> sloane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:

>>> 1. sci.astrology

I'd have to vote against the formation of any group with a
self-contradictory such as sci.astrology.  I can't imagine anyone with
a quarter brain would consider putting astrology in the sci.*
hierarchy, and since there wouldn't be anything worthwhile in the
newsgroup anyway, I can't imagine feeling guilty about opposing it's
formation.  Next thing you know someone'll propose sci.creationism...
-=-
-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)

Now that the WBA and the WBC have been merged into the WWF, is the IBF
SOL?