Xref: utzoo soc.culture.indian:23767 news.groups:17723 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!manglik From: manglik@bgsuvax.UUCP (Pankaj Manglik) Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian,news.groups Subject: Re: soc.culture.pakistan Message-ID: <5432@bgsuvax.UUCP> Date: 13 Feb 90 18:38:54 GMT References: <35260@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <36050248@hpindda.HP.COM> <110294@ti-csl.csc.ti.com> <4890@amelia.nas.nasa.gov> <5547.25d7d822@uhvax1.uh.edu> Reply-To: manglik@bgsuvax.UUCP (Pankaj Manglik) Followup-To: soc.culture.indian Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh. Lines: 19 In article <5547.25d7d822@uhvax1.uh.edu> acsiq@uhvax1.uh.edu writes: > > have to realize is that although Pakistan and India have the same > cultural heritage, their present day societies are becoming more > and more different. And as long as people continue to ignore this > fact, there is no hope of an understanding between the two countries. > So allow us our own identity and soc.culture.pakistan and then maybe > we can talk. > Faisal. I agree. Though I was initially strongly in favour of s.c.neutral, I have to agree that there are some things that are strictly Indian. For example, where would you post the following: The 3 degrees of egoism - I, Iyer, Iyengar In rec.humor or s.c.asia ? What is probably required is not to rename s.c.i but to create s.c.pak as well as s.c.neutralname.debate/news Pankaj Manglik