Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!wuarchive!mit-eddie!bu.edu!lectroid!jjmhome!banyan!tim
From: tim@banyan.UUCP (Tim Henrion@Eng@Banyan)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: rec.arts.erotica - call for votes
Message-ID: <733@banyan.UUCP>
Date: 14 Feb 90 19:23:13 GMT
References: <25CBBFBB.4E27@telly.on.ca> <730@banyan.UUCP> <2117@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Lines: 28
In-reply-to: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM's message of 9 Feb 90 23:08:07 GMT

I said:
| | I am not against the creation of this group, I just believe
| | alt.sex.erotica is a better place for it.
| 
To which bill davidsen said:
|   "Not in my backyard," right?
|
	Nope. I don't even read anything in rec.arts.

And continues to say:
| I don't think that this group will be particularly offensive
| to most people. They (a) don't have to read it, and (b) would
| have to unrot articles which are explicit.
|
	When I posted my original message, the idea of rot13'ing
	everything had not yet been presented. This sounds good
	to me.

	Some people seem to think I'm some type of snot-nosed
	prude because of my original posting on the subject.
	Nothing is further from the truth. I'm a pretty offensive
	person, just ask anybody I work with. But being an offensive
	person makes you realize just how easily certain types
	of people can be offended. I was just trying to inject
	a little consideration. Well, excuuuuuuuuuuuse me...

Tim Henrion
tim@banyan.com --or-- ...!bu.edu!banyan!tim