Xref: utzoo comp.unix.microport:3981 news.software.b:4140
Path: utzoo!utstat!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!ists!yunexus!davecb
From: davecb@yunexus.UUCP (David Collier-Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport,news.software.b
Subject: Re: Cnews ported to V/AT?
Message-ID: <7470@yunexus.UUCP>
Date: 11 Feb 90 19:42:59 GMT
References: <45@frau.UUCP> <3+1:A3-@splut.conmicro.com> <1990Feb8.182437.25095@utzoo.uucp> <+#4:94@splut.conmicro.com>
Organization: York U. Computing Services
Lines: 17

jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard) writes:

>Expanding the macro by hand resolves the problem. Analogous changes need
>to be made wherever nnfree() and nnafree() are used.

  At the expense of suggsting the obvious, would it not be better
to write a "foo_free" function and just have the macros expand to it?

#define nnfree foo_free
int foo_free(void *p) {
	return (p != 0)? free(p): (void *) NULL;
}
-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | davecb@yunexus, ...!yunexus!davecb or
72 Abitibi Ave.,      | {toronto area...}lethe!dave 
Willowdale, Ontario,  | Joyce C-B:
CANADA. 416-223-8968  |    He's so smart he's dumb.