Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!lll-winken!attctc!kcdev!obrien
From: obrien@kcdev.UUCP (John Obrien x4089)
Newsgroups: unix-pc.uucp
Subject: Re: HDB uucp
Summary: What I've noticed
Keywords: HDB uucp
Message-ID: <1051@kcdev.UUCP>
Date: 13 Feb 90 14:13:47 GMT
References: <1990Feb10.061131.16495@rducky.uucp> <9724@spool.cs.wisc.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Kansas City, MO.
Lines: 7



What I've noticed is different on the Unix-pc about HDB cu, is that
the 'put' and 'take' options really work.  I don't know to much about
the uucp because I  haven't used it to often.  I'm sure someone else
will let you know for sure but my guess is that the stock uucp/cu on
the Unix-pc was not a full implementation, whereas HDB was.