Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rpi!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!jarthur!jmerrill
From: jmerrill@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (Jason Merrill)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: Binaries and which packing (Was Re: xx vs. uu)
Message-ID: <4426@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: 16 Feb 90 00:24:22 GMT
References: <1513@krafla.rhi.hi.is> <1990Feb14.134810.8305@uwasa.fi> <1745@borabora.omni.com> <1489@dfsun1.electro.swri.edu>
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Lines: 13

In article <1489@dfsun1.electro.swri.edu> robison@dfsun1.electro.swri.edu (Bob Robison) writes:
>In article <1745@borabora.omni.com> bob@omni.com (Bob Weissman) writes:
>>I beg to differ.  I don't have extensive experience with zip, and none
>>with lzh, but zoo is the first archiver I've seen which lets you pack an
>>entire directory hierarchy with one command, and unpack it into the same
>>hierarchy with one command.  This is real useful.  You just have to forget
>
>I also think that this is important (maintaining directory heirarchies).
>That has been the biggest advantage of zoo that I have seen.
>...

You can do that with PKZIP, too.  The command is 'pkzip -r -p' (recurse
subdirs and include paths)