Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!hpmwtd!jeffa
From: jeffa@hpmwtd.HP.COM (Jeff Aguilera)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Shouldn't ANSI have provided nonvolatile instead of volatile?
Message-ID: <680018@hpmwjaa.HP.COM>
Date: 15 Feb 90 16:54:07 GMT
References: <1117.18:37:35@stealth.acf.nyu.edu>
Organization: HP Microwave Tech. - Santa Rosa, Ca.
Lines: 9

> I would also imagine, that more people use Turbo C nowadays than ever
> used PCC, so what is the current existing practice if it's a choice
> between these two?

Gee. I don't see cdecl, pascal, near, far, interrupt, ... in the standard.
Methinks existing practice is the intersection of all portable code, not one
vendor's installed base.  Is that ambiguous enough :-?
-----
jeffa