Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.UUCP (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: LMI Forth(s)
Message-ID: <477.UUL1.3#5129@willett.UUCP>
Date: 16 Feb 90 02:35:41 GMT
Organization: Latest link in the ForthNet chain.  (Pgh, PA)
Lines: 26


 Date: 02-13-90 (18:38)              Number: 425
   To: RAY DUNCAN                    Refer#: 392
 From: PETER MURPHY                    Read: 02-13-90 (23:47)
 Subj: UR/F DICTIONARY               Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE

 Will the 386 version work on a 286 machine?  Or do you mean that the
 best way to gain dictionary space with UR/F is to give up on 286
 totally?  I mean, what are the hardware requirements for 386 UR/F?

 NET/Mail : LMI Forth Board, Los Angeles, CA (213) 306-3530             

 Date: 02-13-90 (23:47)              Number: 426
   To: PETER MURPHY                  Refer#: 784
 From: RAY DUNCAN                      Read: NO
 Subj: UR/F DICTIONARY               Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE

 The 386 version requires a 386 or 486 processor.  I realize that in the
 short term this is not practical for many people, but at the rate that
 entry level systems are shifting from 286s to 386SXs the situation will
 be much different within a year.

 NET/Mail : LMI Forth Board, Los Angeles, CA (213) 306-3530             
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett through a semi-automated process.
Report problems to: 'uunet!willett!dwp' or 'willett!dwp@gateway.sei.cmu.edu'