Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.lans:4397 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:10302 comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc:2423
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!kaukau.comp.vuw.ac.nz!asjl
From: Andy.Linton@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Andy Linton)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: TCP Ethernet Throughput (AMD vs. Intel vs. Seeq)
Message-ID: <1990Feb19.214931.440@kaukau.comp.vuw.ac.nz>
Date: 19 Feb 90 21:49:31 GMT
References: <9637@cbmvax.commodore.com> <2447@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <582@berlioz.nsc.com> <29000@amdcad.AMD.COM> <29914@sparkyfs.istc.sri.com>
Sender: news@kaukau.comp.vuw.ac.nz (News Admin)
Reply-To: Andy.Linton@comp.vuw.ac.nz
Organization: Computer Science Dept, Victoria University, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
Lines: 12

There have been a number of articles on the problems with the LANCE.

Has anyone any idea if this is used on the MICOM-Interlan boards, NI5010
and NP600A. I'm trying to track down a problem with transfer rates on
machines using these boards. Also there seems to be some debate about
whether the 3-Com boards use the LANCE.

Thanks
andy
--
SENDER = Andy Linton
EMAIL  = Andy.Linton@comp.vuw.ac.nz	PHONE = +64 4 721 000 x8978