Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!portal!portal!cup.portal.com!Classic_-_Concepts From: Classic_-_Concepts@cup.portal.com Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Re:Byte by Byte / WordPerfect Message-ID: <27063@cup.portal.com> Date: 18 Feb 90 18:35:58 GMT References: <87.25D6A8B2@afitamy.fidonet.org> Distribution: na Organization: The Portal System (TM) Lines: 43 It makes me nervous to see good products or major companies dropping their Amiga lines and continuing to support the software on other computers (Mac, Blue). People are quick to charge the companies with 'greed', but if it were simply that, wouldn't they want to sell to as many different markets as possible, thus including, rather than excluding the Amiga? Having seen this happen to not a few products in the last 6 months, I'm forced to speculate on other reasons. We all know the average price of good software on the Amiga is lower than on most other systems. Desktop publishing programs on the Mac run $300-$500ish, on the Amiga they are about half. The same goes for many other categories, including business software. Also, in spite of an installed base of over a million machines, major players are still noticeably absent. It's obvious that developing applications for a computer that includes both line mode and windowing interfaces is going to take a bit longer than developing for line mode only or windowing system (Mac) only, so we could expect development time and costs to perhaps be higher. Also, the Amiga crowd appears to be more critical and particular about the quality of software. This is good, I think, but again would increase development time and costs. This is pure speculation, so easy on the flames, and I'd love to hear from some of the developers who have stayed away from the Amiga, BUT, are prices of Amiga software too low to provide incentive? And I'm not talking about incentives for big profits, I mean just enough to cover development and after-sale support (which is a big chunk of the cost)? What provoked me to write this is a local friend who has been a STRONG promoter and advocate of the Amiga since early 1986. He's been very active in users groups, he's demoed the machine all over the place, he helps everyone with Amiga problems... He recently bought an AT-clone for some of his consulting work with non-Amiga clients. Almost every day he calls to tell me about some exciting, well-designed piece of software (a lot of it database-oriented) on the IBM and bemoans the fact that there's nothing like it for the Amiga, which he considers a superior architecture (and so do I). Well, when someone that informed and that pro-Amiga comes off as just generally p*ssed off at the machine and is spending his leisure time playing with IBM applications, I can't help but spend time trying to understand the whys/wherefores, and, more important, what could be done to rectify the situation. Any ideas, comments or constructive solutions people might like to offer? Seeing the Amiga version of Sculpt-Animate 'dropped' broke my heart since the Amiga SHINES in this area. LadyHawke@cup.portal.com