Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UWEC.BITNET!S707503
From: S707503@UWEC.BITNET (MARK RINECK)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: What to do with the GS
Message-ID: <900215.14234966.045988@UWEC.CP6>
Date: 15 Feb 90 20:23:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 21

The point that I was trying to make is not that the average person
*must* buy a MacIntosh. However, the MacIntosh *is* Apple's competitor
in the business market. I know that when I graduate, any work I do on
micros will probably involve either IBM or Mac.

This is what I meant by "graduating" to the Macintosh. Not that I would
get rid of the GS and "upgrade" to a Mac. I seriously doubt seeing a GS
in a networked/large business environment. (Of course some small businesses
may use one or two GS's and Appleworks...)

$500 for a GS monitor is ridiculous. $300 would be more like it. I am just
the kind of person that doesn't believe in paying more than a reasonable
price for something...640 X 480 is still something I would like to see.
I realize that this is quite complicated...some graphics-specialized
chips might be needed...multi-sync monitors would do that resolution
( and higher) better than a normal-sync would...it's all taken into
consideration.

Markie                                 S707503@UWEC.BITNET
CS Major at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
"Why is a mouse when it spins?"