Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!ists!yunexus!maccs!cs4g6aw
From: cs4g6aw@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca (Amos Yung)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: TASM vs MASM
Message-ID: <25DDF17D.16028@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
Date: 18 Feb 90 00:51:09 GMT
Reply-To: cs4g6aw@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca (Amos Yung)
Organization: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
Lines: 17


Greetings, earthlings.

I am in a process of choosing a pc assembler for a project and it comes
down to two choices: Turbo Assembler (TASM) form Borland and Microsoft
Assembler (MASM) for Microsoft. I personnally inclined to TASM becuase
it supports simplifed segment directives. But on the other hand, MASM 
has been a standard for so long and it is probably safer.

Any opinion on TASM vs MASM? I appreciate any input via e-mail and I will
post a summary upon request.

-- 
Amos Yung          |    "Go sit on a PHASER!"
McMaster University| 
cs4g6aw@130.113.1.1|      - The guy who dressed like Geordi in "Night Court"
                   |