Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jato!mars!kaleb
From: kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: TASM vs MASM
Message-ID: <2867@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Date: 19 Feb 90 17:08:10 GMT
References: <25DDF17D.16028@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
Sender: news@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov
Reply-To: kaleb@mars.UUCP (Kaleb Keithley)
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
Lines: 12

In article <25DDF17D.16028@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> cs4g6aw@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca (Amos Yung) writes:
>I personnally inclined to TASM becuase
>it supports simplifed segment directives. But on the other hand, MASM 
>has been a standard for so long and it is probably safer.

TASM probably supports simplified segment directives in order to be compatible
with MASM, which has had simplified segment directives ever since 5.0.

Chewey, get us outta here!
                 
kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov            Jet Propeller Labs
Kaleb Keithley