Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!ohstpy!miavx1!rskaelber
From: rskaelber@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: MegaPixel Peculiarities
Message-ID: <1027.25e091ca@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>
Date: 20 Feb 90 05:39:38 GMT
References: <8388@shlump.nac.dec.com> <814.25db858a@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> <4280@helios.TAMU.EDU>
Lines: 25

In article <4280@helios.TAMU.EDU>, daugher@cssunf.tamu.edu (Dr. Walter C. Daugherity) writes:
> 
> If the NeXT monitor is THAT sensitive then it should have a mu-metal case
> around the CRT instead of plastic.  Maybe you could wrap the top, bottom,
> and sides in mu-metal foil?
> 
It's not THAT bad (at least in our case :)  ), but the orientation does make
a viewable difference in the display. Another peculiarity (this is strictly
rumour, but it sounds plausible) is the cable's 3 meter length may not be
changed, or the picture will become distorted due to some filtering aspect
of the monitor.
################################################################################

 "Saved again by technology"        |     Randy Kaelber (H.R.H. King Lerxst II)
                                    |     Academic Computing Services
                                    |     Miami University, Oxford, Ohio

"Love responds to your invitation, Love responds to your imagination." 
                                                      -Neil Peart/Rush

*******************************************************************************

Disclaimer: "This posting was generated by a neural network program with a
damaged heuristic core. The Owner of this account assumes no responsibility
for incoherent posts."