Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!swbatl!texbell!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc Subject: Re: Open Look versus Motif, and it's effect on NeWS vs. X. Message-ID: <:8S1SU7xds13@ficc.uu.net> Date: 15 Feb 90 17:49:34 GMT References: <2935@auspex.auspex.com> Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 15 > >One thing that occures to me is that this Open Look versus Motif thing > >would be easier to deal with under NeWS. It would be reasonable to implement > >most of the UI in the server, and have the *user* choose Open Look or > >Motif, with NeWS. It's not really reasonable to do this under X. > Unless: [dynamic linking] + a single API for both Motif and Open Look + > [binary compatible interface] That's a good point. If you can get the APIs together for Motif and Open Look it should be possible to let the user select them. So "unreasonable" isn't a fair description. Is anyone working on this, though? It looks like the "standard" for Motif and OpenLook is pretty much cast in stone. It seems as if NeWS gives you more leeway for getting around shortcomings in individual programs. -- _--_|\ Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . / \ \_.--._/ Xenix Support -- it's not just a job, it's an adventure! v "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'