Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!decwrl!ucbvax!hplabs!nsc!balaji
From: balaji@nsc.nsc.com (Balaji Pitchaikani)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: What about a Windows binaries group?
Message-ID: <13606@nsc.nsc.com>
Date: 15 Feb 90 18:34:29 GMT
References: <16164.25d924c5@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> <2847@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Distribution: usa
Organization: National Semiconductor, Santa Clara
Lines: 24

In article <2847@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> morris@jade.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Mike Morris) writes:
>hadgraft@civeng.monash.edu.au (Roger Hadgraft) writes: 
>>It seems to me that we could all benefit from a Windows binaries group - 
>>perhaps comp.windows.ms.binaries? 
>>
>>What say the rest of you?
>
>Fine - as long as it gest used...  
>I know that there are several beginners reading this, myself included,
>who would love to see some good programs come along, WITH COMMENTED SOURCE!
   
     Yes - I would also appreciate it. But .. I would prefer to
     have a comp.windows.ms.sources (Commented) instead of just
     binaries.

 - balaji -

---------
My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

email : balaji@nsc.nsc.com.UUCP
snail : 3707, Poinciana Dr, #27             Work : (408) - 721-2483
        SantaClara, CA-95051                Home : (408) - 243-6034
---------