Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!bruce!monu1!vaxc!cie590l
From: hadgraft@civeng.monash.edu.au (Roger Hadgraft)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: What about a Windows binaries group?
Message-ID: <16643.25e1049c@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au>
Date: 19 Feb 90 21:49:32 GMT
References: <16164.25d924c5@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> <1227@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de> <22948@usc.edu>
Organization: Civil Engineering, Monash University, Australia
Lines: 14

In article <22948@usc.edu>, papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes:
> Forget about a comp.windows.ms.binaries or similar.  The volume in
> comp.windows.ms is so SMALL, that it is not even worth considering.  Take
> a look at the volume of the ibmpc, Mac and Amiga groups to get an idea
> of what kind of volume makes a binaries and sources group feasable.
> My 2c.
>
Is it worth posting binaries here? Or is everyone so concerned about viruses
that that is unacceptable?
--
Roger Hadgraft                  |  hadgraft@civeng.monash.edu.au
Lecturer in Civil Engineering   |  phone:  +61 3 565 4983
Monash University               |  fax:    +61 3 565 3409
Clayton, Vic. 3168. Australia.  |