Path: utzoo!dciem!c-art!jae
From: jae@c-art.UUCP (Yukon Born)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Running FRAME X11.R3 under X11.R4
Message-ID: <280@c-art.UUCP>
Date: 13 Feb 90 22:47:43 GMT
References: <1990Feb11.184104.5253@aurora.com> <DRICH.90Feb11134354@klaatu.lanl.gov>
Reply-To: jae@c-art.UUCP (Yukon Born)
Organization: Computing Art Inc
Lines: 26

In article <DRICH.90Feb11134354@klaatu.lanl.gov> drich@klaatu.lanl.gov (David Rich) writes:
|In article <1990Feb11.184104.5253@aurora.com>
| geof@aurora.com (Geoffrey H. Cooper) writes:
|
|   A note for FRAME X users, FRAME tech support just helped me to get
|   FRAME 1.3x running under X11.R4.
|
|   - Geof
|   geof@aurora.com / aurora!geof@decwrl.dec.com / geof%aurora.com@decwrl.dec.com
|
|Are you talking Frame as in FrameMaker? Does this mean that Frame
|Technology produces a product that runs under X11? What's the news
|regarding Frame 2.0? Any and all information appreciated!

Yes, this is FrameMaker.

FrameMaker1.3X runs under X11, and Frame's newest product, 
FrameMaker2.0X will be demonstrated at Seybold Seminars Ninety, 
March 5 - 8 at the Boston Marriott Copley Place on HP platforms.  

-john

John Eadie   _Computing Art Inc_ (416) 536-9951  FAX (416) 530 0714 
Studio #303, 25 Liberty St, Toronto .. jeadie@Sun.COM | jae@c-art.UUCP

`these deepest problems are in fact *not* problems at all.' - Wittgenstein