Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!converse
From: converse@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Donna Converse)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Xt doc
Message-ID: <9002141950.AA00427@expo.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 14 Feb 90 19:50:49 GMT
References: <702@ncis.tis.llnl.gov>
Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background)
Organization: X Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Lines: 14


> In article <9002140105.AA04405@expo.lcs.mit.edu> converse@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Donna Converse) writes:
> >
> >> The trouble is that R3 and R4 Intrinsics document
> >> does not distinguish between functionality designed for the
> >> application programmer, and functionality designed for a widget
> >> writer.
> >
> >Read the "About this Manual" page.
> 
> Since I haven't printed the Xt R4 doc, I recommend looking in the Xaw index
> for the list of acceptable Xt calls for application writers.  Is this ok?

No, it is not ok.