Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!boulder!stan!abbeyroad!rwg
From: rwg@abbeyroad.Solbourne.COM (Rick Gillespie)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION:  Creation of rec.arts.dance
Keywords: ballroom dance latin modern swing
Message-ID: <1990Feb15.165934.12995@Solbourne.COM>
Date: 15 Feb 90 16:59:34 GMT
References: <561@dino.cs.iastate.edu>
Sender: news@Solbourne.COM
Reply-To: rwg@abbeyroad.UUCP (Rick Gillespie)
Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc.
Lines: 19

In article <561@dino.cs.iastate.edu> mehl@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu writes:
>The rec.arts.dance Charter
>--------------------------
>This is to be an unmoderated discussion forum on all dance forms
>and issues not already represented on Usenet.  Currently, the only
>dance-oriented news group on Usenet is rec.folk-dancing.  This
>group is devoted to any folk-dancing form or issue.  This includes
>international folk, contra, square, round, cajun (including two-step),
>western square, morris, and country-type dancing (clogging).

Is there a way to discuss actual dance *steps*? That is, a notation
that is widely accepted in "dance circles" (sic). Otherwise, how
do you/we "discuss" dancing?

Rick Gillespie				| Solbourne Computer, Inc.
UUCP: ...![uunet,boulder]!stan!rwg	| 1900 Pike Rd.
Internet: rwg@solbourne.com		| Longmont, CO 80501
"If you want to BE the man, you've got	| (303) 678-4723
 to BEAT the man!"			|