Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!mtxinu!frk From: frk@mtxinu.COM (Frank Korzeniewski) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: aquaria: version 1 Message-ID: <1129@mtxinu.UUCP> Date: 15 Feb 90 19:57:33 GMT References: <9002150200.AA22180@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> Reply-To: frk@mtxinu.UUCP (Frank Korzeniewski) Followup-To: alt.flame Organization: mt Xinu, Berkeley Lines: 36 In article peter@ficc.uu.net (peter da silva) writes: #In article <9002150200.AA22180@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>, rsex@stb.UUCP writes: #> Sci.aquaria has better distibution than rec.aquaria but there are still #> enough sites that aren't being neighborly and doing silly things with it. # #In other words propogation of sci.aquaria is less than the distribution #would suggest, because there are many site administrators that didn't #beleive that the vote creating it was held fairly and actually represents #the consensus on Usenet. I had to laugh when I read this. One of the motives for sci.aquaria was that it would get better distrubution than if it were rec.aquaria. Guess what? IT DOES!!! You can rationalize till the cows come home, it is obvious that you have lost BIG in the aquaria battles. #> There are a few that are messing with rec.aquaria out of spite to the #> f*ccheads. # #We don't get any aquaria groups here, so that's rather like cutting off your #nose to spite someone else's face. All these people are doing is hurting #themselves. This should be counter-balanced by those messing with sci.aquaria out of spite to Richard Sexton. #Oh, and I don't have anything to do with the people who refuse to carry #sci.aquaria. Sugar carries it, in fact, with no fun & games. Yes, and your propaganda assault had nothing what so ever to do with anything. # _--_|\ Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . #/ \ #\_.--._/ Xenix Support -- it's not just a job, it's an adventure! # v "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-' Frank Korzeniewski (frk@mtxinu.com)