Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!wuarchive!texbell!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Redesigning the hierarchy (Re: Getting PCs out of the core newsgroups) Message-ID: Date: 21 Feb 90 04:15:52 GMT References: <17958@rpp386.cactus.org> <17998@rpp386.cactus.org> Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 14 In article <17998@rpp386.cactus.org> jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) writes: > On the other hand, putting all the PC traffic in its own tree would > make it easier for PC USENET sites to carry only the relevant techincal > traffic. Agreed, there's a lot to be said for putting all the micro groups under one hierararchy. I just don't see why that hierarchy can't go under comp. comp.pc comp.pc.ibm comp.pc.ibm.sources comp.pc.ibm.binaries comp.pc.ibm.programmer ... and so on, with equivalents for .mac, .amiga, .apple2, .etc... -- _--_|\ Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . / \ \_.--._/ Xenix Support -- it's not just a job, it's an adventure! v "Have you hugged your wolf today?" `-_-'