Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!udel!eplrx7!leipold
From: leipold@eplrx7.uucp (Walt Leipold)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call For Discussion: comp.sys.mac reorganization
Message-ID: <1990Feb20.134921.1410@eplrx7.uucp>
Date: 20 Feb 90 13:49:21 GMT
References: <38768@apple.Apple.COM> <3996@hub.UUCP> <38783@apple.Apple.COM>
Sender: usenet@udel.EDU
Reply-To: leipold@eplrx7.UUCP (Walt Leipold)
Organization: DuPont Engineering Physics Lab
Lines: 31

In article <38783@apple.Apple.COM> chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes:
>I currently plan on leaving c.s.m.programmer alone because I really don't
>think it needs to be fixed.
>
>As to c.s.m.p itself, I considered setting it up as a hierarchy, but I think
>it might be overkill right now. I also considered setting it up with the
>amiga naming standards (c.s.m.tech), which is easier to type and probably a
>better name for a hierarchy (programmer is better for a single group,
>though). Try:
>
>c.s.m.tech.c
>c.s.m.tech.macapp
>c.s.m.tech.misc
>c.s.m.tech.mpw
>c.s.m.tech.pascal

Then of course you'll need "c.s.m.tech.hardware" instead of the
current "c.s.m.hardware", right?  The original posting didn't
mention c.s.m.hardware at all...

Oh, BTW, I'm in all favor of the reorganization; the S/N ratio on
c.s.m has been particularly low lately.

>Chuq Von Rospach   <+>   chuq@apple.com   <+>   [This is myself speaking]

-- 
"As long as you've lit one candle,                         Walt Leipold
you're allowed to curse the darkness."       (leipolw%esvax@dupont.com)
--
--
The UUCP Mailer