Xref: utzoo comp.unix.microport:4000 news.software.b:4185
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!fernwood!apple!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!texbell!splut!jay
From: jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport,news.software.b
Subject: Re: Cnews ported to V/AT?
Message-ID: <Z.9:YY&@splut.conmicro.com>
Date: 16 Feb 90 14:02:10 GMT
References: <45@frau.UUCP> <3+1:A3-@splut.conmicro.com> <1990Feb8.182437.25095@utzoo.uucp> <+#4:94@splut.conmicro.com> <7470@yunexus.UUCP>
Reply-To: jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard)
Organization: Confederate Microsystems, League City, TX
Lines: 19

In article <7470@yunexus.UUCP> davecb@yunexus.UUCP (David Collier-Brown) writes:
>jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard) writes:
>>Expanding the macro by hand resolves the problem. Analogous changes need
>>to be made wherever nnfree() and nnafree() are used.
>  At the expense of suggsting the obvious, would it not be better
>to write a "foo_free" function and just have the macros expand to it?
>#define nnfree foo_free
>int foo_free(void *p) {
>	return (p != 0)? free(p): (void *) NULL;
>}

This looks feasible, as well...I'll try it if the HP Spectrum fix doesn't
work.

-- 
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL   | Never ascribe to malice that which can
jay@splut.conmicro.com       (eieio)| adequately be explained by stupidity.
{attctc,bellcore}!texbell!splut!jay +----------------------------------------
                             Free the DC-10!