Path: utzoo!utgpu!CUVMA!SWL-L Date: Mon, 19 Feb 90 10:37:34 EST Reply-To: "Michael R. Batchelor" Sender: Short Wave Listener's List Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was From: "Michael R. Batchelor" Subject: Re: VOTE on rec.radio.noncomm X-To: swl-l@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: UofToronto LAN redistribution Message-ID: <90Feb22.002638est.58748@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca> Newsgroups: bitnet.swl-l Distribution: ut Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu > > I believe that rec.radio.noncomm would deal with the _programming_ of > noncommercial _broadcast_ stations (88-92 mHz FM. primarily). > It seems pretty obvious to me that the discussion for this new group was woefully inadequate. I'm not a usenet guru, but I don't remember ANY serious discussion of this group. Much less a clear explanation of its proposed charter. I would say a call for votes is out of order just for lack of protocol. Creating the new group would probably cause a big stink. Please direct me to the discussion if I'm wrong. Michael -- Michael Batchelor / \113\101\067\132\116\132 uunet!wshb!mikebat!michaelb Back when *I* got *MY* license *WE* had to pass the code test. And I thought it was a damn stupid idea then too.