Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: davidb@pacer.com (David Barts)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Prevalence of 10xxx Dialing
Message-ID: <4226@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 21 Feb 90 08:26:25 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 15
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 119, message 6 of 9


Randal Schwartz <merlyn@iwarp.intel.com> writes:
 
> 'course, this works only in those areas that have 10XXX (Feature Group D?)
> dialing.
 
> Is that everywhere *except* the backwaters of GTE Northwest, now?  Or
> are there still many places that don't have 10XXX dialing?

When I lived in Richland, WA two years ago, their exchange was GTE
and the 10xxx codes worked.  In fact, GTE being GTE, I *had* to use
10xxx for several months until I got 1+ service connected.

David Barts			Pacer Corporation
davidb@pacer.uucp		...!uunet!pilchuck!pacer!davidb