Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: la063249@zach.fit.edu (Bill Huttig)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Prevalence of 10xxx Dialing
Message-ID: <4227@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 21 Feb 90 16:57:47 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: Bill Huttig <zach!la063249%winnie@uunet.uu.net>
Organization: Florida Institute of Technology, ACS, Melbourne, FL
Lines: 9
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 119, message 7 of 9


In article <4141@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Cowan <cowan@marob.masa.com> writes:
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 116, message 8 of 8

>(I suppose that GTE comes under the terms of the MFJ because it owns
>Sprint.  True or false?)

GTE only owns a small part of US Sprint < 20% United Telephone owns
the rest.  If the MFJ applied to GTE it should also apply to United.