Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:26371 comp.lang.c++:6677 comp.sys.ibm.pc:45345
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!dinl!schwartz
From: schwartz@dinl.uucp (Michael Schwartz)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Zortech problems
Message-ID: <1541@dinl.mmc.UUCP>
Date: 27 Feb 90 22:27:10 GMT
References: <48cc3c8b.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM> <00020@meph.UUCP> <126@intek01.UUCP>
Reply-To: schwartz@dinl.UUCP (Michael Schwartz)
Organization: Martin Marietta I&CS, Denver CO.
Lines: 13

<re: other PC products>
I believe the author was referring to the major expense of both a 
C++ to C compiler, added to the cost of a C to object compiler.  
Zortech appears to have the competition beat by half ;->
Michael
-- 
-----------------------
schwartz@pogo.den.mmc.com  "Expect everything ... 
mschwartz@mmc.com                   and the unexpected never happens." 
ncar!dinl!schwartz                               --the phantom tollbooth

DISCLAIMER:  The opinions expressesed are not necessarily those of my 
	     employer or myself.