Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari!ames!eos!shelby!csli!tylman
From: tylman@csli.Stanford.EDU (Galia Tylman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Allegro Composer vs SUN SPE
Message-ID: <12419@csli.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 25 Feb 90 20:51:33 GMT
References: <793@laic.UUCP>
Sender: tylman@csli.Stanford.EDU (Galia Tylman)
Reply-To: tylman@csli.stanford.edu (Galia Tylman)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford U.
Lines: 19

In article <793@laic.UUCP> ik@laic.lockheed.com writes:
>>  	Is there anyone out there using Allegro Composer or SUN SPE.
>>  I need to choose fairly quickly between these or some other 
>>  lisp development environment running on a SUN sparkstation.  I'll be
>>  happy to post a summary of responses.
>
>  - Composer gives you profiling, which keeps track of how much time is
>    spent inside each function. This statistical summary is nicely presented
>    through a tree. I can't recall whether SPE had a similar feature.

With SUN Common Lisp 4.0 this feature is part of the Delivery Toolkit so I
assume when SPE is available on SCL4.0 you will be able to get this 
information.

Galia


-- 
Galia Tylman		Internet:  tylman@csli.stanford.edu