Xref: utzoo news.groups:18048 comp.lang.misc:4176 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!dkuug!iesd!iesd.auc.dk!fischer From: fischer@iesd.auc.dk (Lars P. Fischer) Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: comp.lang.functional Message-ID: Date: 21 Feb 90 16:56:20 GMT References: <1619@husc6.harvard.edu> <1797@skye.ed.ac.uk> Sender: news@iesd.auc.dk (UseNet News) Organization: Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Aalborg Lines: 15 In-reply-to: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk's message of 20 Feb 90 19:31:48 GMT In article <1797@skye.ed.ac.uk> jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) writes: >The only problem would be if we later wanted a ML group, >say. Should it have to be comp.lang.functional.ml? Nah, that would be comp.lang.(s)ml. Comp.lang.functional would be like comp.lang.misc, that is, the group for all the functional languages w/o their own group. Anyway, comp.lang.functional is a good idea. You have my support. Note, btw, that there is already a (quite active) SML mailing list. /Lars -- Lars Fischer, fischer@iesd.auc.dk | If you want PL/I, you know where to CS Dept., Univ. of Aalborg, DENMARK. | find it. -- D. M. Ritchie