Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!burdvax!dave
From: dave@PRC.Unisys.COM (David Lee Matuszek)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Anyone want to design a languag
Message-ID: <12968@burdvax.PRC.Unisys.COM>
Date: 26 Feb 90 18:14:03 GMT
References: <1944@l.cc.purdue.edu> <7300007@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <15190@bfmny0.UU.NET>
Sender: news@PRC.Unisys.COM
Organization: Unisys Corporation, Paoli Research Center; Paoli, PA
Lines: 11

In article <15190@bfmny0.UU.NET> tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff) writes:
>Wouldn't depth-by-indentation make include files a nightmare?

Why?  I would expect include files to come in at the depth of the
include statement.  Just think of indentation as relative, rather than
absolute.

-- Dave Matuszek (dave@prc.unisys.com)
-- Unisys Corp. / Paoli Research Center / PO Box 517 / Paoli PA  19301
-- Any resemblance between my opinions and those of my employer is improbable.
  << Those who fail to learn from Unix are doomed to repeat it. >>