Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!emv
From: emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl
Subject: Re: Bug or misunderstanding?
Message-ID: <EMV.90Feb27183449@duby.math.lsa.umich.edu>
Date: 27 Feb 90 23:34:49 GMT
References: <2860@uvaarpa.virginia.edu>
	<1990Feb27.174836.21449@iwarp.intel.com> <7202@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV>
Sender: news@math.lsa.umich.edu
Organization: University of Michigan Math Dept., Ann Arbor MI.
Lines: 15
In-reply-to: lwall@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV's message of 27 Feb 90 23:21:41 GMT


   : for (split(/(.)/,"Just another Perl hacker,")) {print if $_;}

   Interestingly, I had broken this here.  It told me "split loop".  So I
   unbroke it.

   Jest, the nether Perl heckler,
   Larry

Uh huh.  So any version of perl has to pass the "Just another Perl hacker,"
test, with all of Randal's one-liners generating the same output.  
(Does anyone have the complete collection to this point?  It should
be interesting study...)

--Ed