Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!apple!sun-barr!decwrl!orc!mipos3!iwarp.intel.com!news
From: merlyn@iwarp.intel.com (Randal Schwartz)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl
Subject: Re: Bug or misunderstanding?
Message-ID: <1990Feb28.020337.24081@iwarp.intel.com>
Date: 28 Feb 90 02:03:37 GMT
References: <2860@uvaarpa.virginia.edu> <1990Feb27.174836.21449@iwarp.intel.com> <7202@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> <EMV.90Feb27183449@duby.math.lsa.umich.edu>
Sender: news@iwarp.intel.com
Reply-To: merlyn@iwarp.intel.com (Randal Schwartz)
Organization: Stonehenge; netaccess via Intel, Beaverton, Oregon, USA
Lines: 23
In-Reply-To: emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti)

In article <EMV.90Feb27183449@duby.math.lsa.umich.edu>, emv@math (Edward Vielmetti) writes:
| Uh huh.  So any version of perl has to pass the "Just another Perl hacker,"
| test, with all of Randal's one-liners generating the same output.  

Deja vu!

| (Does anyone have the complete collection to this point?  It should
| be interesting study...)

Larry has been archiving comp.lang.perl, and the mailing list before
it.  *I've* only been saving what *other* people have written.  And
what do you mean, "interesting study"?  I can see it now... "the
warped mind of Randal vs. Perl... a case study in progressive
degeneracy". :-)

$_ = <<END; s/../pack('C',hex($&))/ge; print;
4a75737420616e6f74686572205065726c206861636b65722c
END
-- 
/=Randal L. Schwartz, Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095 ==========\
| on contract to Intel's iWarp project, Beaverton, Oregon, USA, Sol III      |
| merlyn@iwarp.intel.com ...!any-MX-mailer-like-uunet!iwarp.intel.com!merlyn |
\=Cute Quote: "Welcome to Portland, Oregon, home of the California Raisins!"=/