Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!jarthur!polyslo!vlsi3b15!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!syd
From: syd@DSI.COM (Syd Weinstein)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Problems with elm? or smail?
Message-ID: <1990Feb23.003157.12884@DSI.COM>
Date: 23 Feb 90 00:31:57 GMT
References: <1990Jan22.024224.9697@DSI.COM> <5045@emory.mathcs.emory.edu>
Reply-To: syd@DSI.COM
Organization: Datacomp Systems, Inc.  Huntingdon Valley, PA
Lines: 14

You don't give me much to go on, (as you don't tell me
the operating system or computer, but it looks like
Elm is not using the proper argument format or arguments
for the MTA you have configured.  (MTA == mail transport
agent, in your case it should be smail 2.5)

I would look to see how either smail is delivering local mail
or how Elm is calling smail.  Elm and smail 2.5 normally
work together just fine.
-- 
=====================================================================
Sydney S. Weinstein, CDP, CCP                   Elm Coordinator
Datacomp Systems, Inc.				Voice: (215) 947-9900
syd@DSI.COM or {bpa,vu-vlsi}!dsinc!syd	        FAX:   (215) 938-0235