Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!limbo!taylor
From: stuartw@tove.umd.edu (Stuart M. Weinstein)
Newsgroups: comp.society
Subject: Re: Manipulation of Courtroom Evidence
Message-ID: <443@limbo.Intuitive.Com>
Date: 22 Feb 90 19:04:10 GMT
Sender: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742
Lines: 8
Approved: taylor@Limbo.Intuitive.Com

> I do not know how it is in the real world, but here in Wisconsin the law
> on photographs is quite clear.  A Photo is admitted as a part of the 
> evidence submitted by a witness.

Does this mean that if the photograph was manipulated, the witness
can be charged with perjury, as if s/he lied on an affidavit?

Stuart