Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!utoday!greenber
From: greenber@utoday.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: Paying for Shareware (Was: Re: v09i070: newsclip 1.1...)
Message-ID: <1309@utoday.UUCP>
Date: 28 Feb 90 00:27:21 GMT
References: <1235@utoday.UUCP> <17923@rpp386.cactus.org> <15166@bfmny0.UU.NET> <34268@watmath.waterloo.edu> <15179@bfmny0.UU.NET> <1268@utoday.UUCP> <15191@bfmny0.UU.NET> <1288@utoday.UUCP> <1990Feb26.132435.19063@robohack.UUCP>
Reply-To: greenber@.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg)
Organization: UNIX Today!, Manhasset, NY
Lines: 19

woods@robohack.UUCP (Greg A. Woods) writes:
>
>Anyway, I don't want you to put down UseNet as a shareware channel
>just because....  Perhaps there's a real reason.

Actually, as a shareware channel, the only thing useful about UseNet is
that there can be pretty fast feedback, something lacking from a lot of
other channels.  I always include my various E-mail addresses (UseNet, BIX,
CIS, MCI, RamNet, etc.) and get the most feedback mail on CIS, followed by
MCI, followed by UseNet.  The UseNet feedback is usually the most 
informative, the MCI the least informative.



-- 
Ross M. Greenberg, President, Software Concepts Design,    greenber@utoday.UUCP
             594 Third Avenue, New York, New York, 10016
 Voice:(212)-889-6431 BIX: greenber  MCI: greenber   CIS: 72461,3212
                            BBS:(212)-889-6438