Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!umich!caen.engin.umich.edu!chrisl From: chrisl@caen.engin.umich.edu (Chris Lang) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: SDB 5.0 question Message-ID: <48c8d920.1a5bf@moth.engin.umich.edu> Date: 21 Feb 90 05:00:00 GMT References: <7875@sdcsvax.UCSD.Edu> <1113@dialogic.UUCP> Reply-To: chrisl@caen.UUCP (Chris Lang) Organization: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Lines: 30 In article <1113@dialogic.UUCP> gerry@pencilbox.UUCP (Gerry Lachac) writes: >I haven't used my new SDB since I got it, except for flipping throught >the manual. The user interface is the same (according to the manual). >Simple 2 letter commands for everything, no menus, no gadgets, etc. >Personally, I think this *stinks* considering MANX had well over a >year to improve it. At least it supports floating point math now. Well, I guess someone has to defend Manx. I LIKE SDB's interface. When I'm debugging, the last thing I want to have to do is choose a menu item or open a cheesey window to do it. I want to type in a simple command and have it executed. SDB does well in this regard...CPR I can tolerate, but I don't care for...MultiScope under OS/2 is particularly horrendous, but its power as compared to CodeView makes me use it. (Neither of them is nearly as flexible as either CPR or SDB. The Amiga's development environment is a joy to use compared to MessyDOS'.) Now that Manx has started using the standard Amiga object file format, does this mean I will be able to debug code produced by Lattice with SDB and code produced by Manx with CPR? I hope so...can someone clarify this for me? Just my 1.5 cents' worth. -Chris ----- Chris Lang University of Michigan, College of Engineering home: 4622 Bursley work: National Center for Manufacturing Sciences Ann Arbor, MI 48109 900 Victors Way, Suite 226 (313) 763-1832 Ann Arbor, MI 48108 chrisl@caen.engin.umich.edu (313) 995-0300 "I hate quotations. Tell me what you know." - Ralph Waldo Emerson