Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!sage.cc.purdue.edu!aj0 From: aj0@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Eric Mulholland) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: file system questions Message-ID: <3692@sage.cc.purdue.edu> Date: 25 Feb 90 21:27:45 GMT References: <1557@crash.cts.com> <38736@apple.Apple.COM> <3637@sage.cc.purdue.edu> <38762@apple.Apple.COM> Reply-To: aj0@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Eric Mulholland) Distribution: usa Organization: Purdue University Lines: 97 >In article aj0@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Eric Mulholland) writes: >> GS/OS on the other hand is a complete rewrite and thus CAPIBLE of >>larger volume sizes. Take a closer look at GS/OS and see that it uses The point of my article is what SIZE volumnes I can currently use in gs/os. Yes gs/os can handle very large volumes, but with system 5.0.2, with all that comes with it, you cannot use a very large drive. (speaking about a local hard drive here) Don't get me wrong, gs/os is a great operating system, makes prodos 8 look like a homework assignment. Here I'm only looking at the aspect of volume size. In article <38762@apple.Apple.COM> mattd@Apple.COM (Matt Deatherage) writes: >Dave has already addressed some of this, but to repeat, drivers talk to the >hardware, FSTs talk to the drivers, GS/OS talks to the FSTs, applications talk >to GS/OS. True. My errors there have been pointed out. >Again, an application makes GS/OS calls, not "ProDOS FST calls" (with some very >minor FST-specific exceptions). The ProDOS FST allows GS/OS to use ProDOS >disks. The FST has all the limitations of the native (in this case, ProDOS) I don't think I mentioned anywhere of trying to make direct calls to the fst. Even making calls to gs/os, I'm not going to get a 100meg file on a directly connected hard drive with the current system software. >ProDOS's file system has fortunately always supported storage types, so other >programs or operating systems (Pascal, GS/OS) can create files on ProDOS disks >that ProDOS 8 won't try to mess with. That's how Pascal Volumes and Extended >Files can fit on those disks without ProDOS 8's knowledge. Changing the whole >disk so ProDOS 8 can't use it is an entirely different matter. Like I was saying, adding more to the definition of prodos disks, or should say changing reserved values into known values. Nothing wrong there. A prodos disk bigger than 32meg is not a prodos disk. That's my point in that the prodos fst cannot be used for making a huge volume. >> There's a Sierra-Online FST. This allows those who have expensive >>CD drives to READ CDs. If and when CDs become writeable, this FST will >>not allow you to take advantage of that since the FST is READ ONLY. >There's a "High Sierra" FST; Sierra On-line has nothing to do with this >international standard for CD-ROM disks which was created at a conference at >the High Sierra resort in Nevada. The FST doesn't support writing because >CD-ROM is currently not a writeable technology. If this changes, the FST >can change. That's why it's not in ROM. I'm embarresed I called that fst by the wrong name. I don't know if CD drives can be hooked up to a scsi card or uses a different interface. This is showing how little I know about the details of scsi and of cd disk format. So it is probibly inposible to trick gs/os into thinking a hard drive is just a small, slow cd. >You would be incorrect. Schools were crying for AppleShare access under GS/OS >ever since GS/OS was released. We listened, we created. As Dave says, >AppleShare (it's not an "AppleTalk FST"; AppleTalk is not a file system) is a >complete networking solution, not a method for individual people to use larger >hard drives (although it does work for that as well). I haven't seen satistics, so, what percentage of Apple //gs owners are schools? I don't think many private (non-school) owners are hooked up to a network. Now that schools got their appleshare fst, may we home users get a super size hard drive fst? >> There is also a Character FST. I don't know about you, but I don't >>see any acceptible way of storing/retrieving files from there. >The Character FST is essential to the I/O model of GS/OS. It's not SUPPOSED >to be a way to access a file system; it deals with the character side of the >I/O model (other FSTs deal with the block side). I included it mainly for completeness. I never expected an answer different then the above one. >> So Matt, you say ProDOS 16 and GS/OS were written to get around the >>limitations of ProDOS 8? The only storage capicaty limit that I see as >>being removed is the number of volumes per slot. With the size of hard >(long list of advantages of gs/os over prodos 8) >What you want is a newer FST (like HFS) to address the file system problems >associated with ProDOS. No one is arguing against that. What I was saying is >that ProDOS 8 (the 8-bit disk operating system) isn't going to deal with >volumes greater than 32 MB. That stands. The way prodos 8 is defined, it cannot be extended. This is why I'd like to see a new fst to make use of super size hard drives. If I want to store prodos 8 and gs/os programs on the same disk, that's what the prodos fst is for. I just don't want to be limit to it! No one is arguing against another fst, we just don't see it. -- ____ Y_,_|[]| Eric Mulholland {|_|_|__| aj0@sage.cc.purdue.edu //oo--OO ...!pur-ee!sage.cc!aj0