Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!umich!terminator!rioja.ifs.umich.edu!ric
From: ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu (Richard Campbell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt
Subject: hc2.1y and dbx
Keywords: dbx
Message-ID: <1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu>
Date: 27 Feb 90 22:57:19 GMT
Sender: usenet@terminator.cc.umich.edu (usenet news)
Reply-To: ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu (Richard Campbell)
Organization: University of Michigan, Institutional File System Project
Lines: 10


At the Washington Usenix RT/AOS4.3 bof, it
was mentioned that hc2.1y was in very good shape
and that it worked well with dbx.

Now that we have hc2.1y, we're not exactly seeing
wonderfullness on the dbx front. Should we? Or do we
need to pick up a new dbx?

Richard Campbell