Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!pur-ee!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!leburg From: leburg@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Brian Pierson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Low-Cost Macintosh Summary: we won't be happy Message-ID: <7504@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> Date: 15 Feb 90 14:13:02 GMT Expires: 28 Feb 90 05:00:00 GMT References: <126900165@p.cs.uiuc.edu> <25c8e25c.62bb@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> <6793@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> <1981@rodan.acs.syr.edu> Reply-To: leburg@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Brian Pierson) Organization: Purdue University Lines: 34 Distribution:na In article <1981@rodan.acs.syr.edu> isr@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Michael S. Schechter - ISR group account) writes: >In article <6793@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> larryh@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Larry Hutchinson) writes: >>There exists a growing body of programs that will only run on 68020/'881 >>level machines. This is particularly true in science and engineering. >> >Yes, but how many people that are interested in $1000 machine are going >to be buying Spice or Mathematica at $800 a shot?? You coudn't possibly >imagine that "borrowing" of programs such as these could ever occur? > >-- >Mike Schechter, Computer Engineer,Institute Sensory Research, Syracuse Univ. >InterNet: isr@rodan.acs.syr.edu Bitnet: SENSORY@SUNRISE It is true that getting a low-cost machine wouldn't stop people from hijacking software but you do have an excellent point. If you were interested in a low end Mac then why are you trying to use high end software? There is a whole world out there that doesn't need or want high end computing. The number of xt clones on the market shows that. Microsoft is also aware of this with their watered down version of Word.(MS Write) The low cost mac needs to have a upgrade path that is reasonable but when the user grows beyond the need to do just simple word processing or spread sheets. All of us on the net are more the high end users, we will not benefit from that low-cost Mac much. Some of us will be able to acquire one for home finally but we won't be happy until it does every thing that our machine at work does. Well the only way to do that is to get one like we have at work. Apple does need to get one out on the market so they can get the user base back up where it deserves to be. If Apple has all the troubles that the business rags say they do it will a needed boost. Well enough of me running off at the fingertips. Coming down off of my soapbox Brian Pierson pierson@midas.mgmt.purdue.edu Disclaimer: What I say is What I say. Ignore it my bosses do