Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uhccux!ames!think!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!crdgw1.ge.com!barnett
From: barnett@crdgw1.crd.ge.com (Bruce Barnett)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: Look and Feel? Or just Look?
Message-ID: <5470@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
Date: 22 Feb 90 15:21:48 GMT
References: <1990Feb17.223729.21903@Solbourne.COM> <1990Feb21.155555.2650@alphalpha.com>
Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com
Reply-To: barnett@crdgw1.crd.ge.com (Bruce Barnett)
Organization: GE Corp. R & D, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 11
In-reply-to: nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley)

>Note
>that a "3D" Open Look on the other hand, is no longer Open Look, because
>it violates the pixel by pixel discriptions in the Open Look Style Guide.

My, you speak wich such authority! :-)

I have a copy of the Functional Specification, dated August 31, 1989,
and it gives examples of the 3-D look.

--
Bruce G. Barnett	<barnett@crd.ge.com>   uunet!crdgw1!barnett