Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!think!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!tek
From: tek@penzance.cs.ucla.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: WM_ICON_SIZE
Message-ID: <32148@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>
Date: 21 Feb 90 20:52:39 GMT
Sender: news@CS.UCLA.EDU
Reply-To: tek@CS.UCLA.EDU (Ted Kim (Random Dude))
Organization: UCLA
Lines: 21

How exactly do you interpret the WM_ICON_SIZE info?

Are the dimensions in pixels supposed to be:
	width = min_width + i * width_increment 
	height = min_height + j * width_increment
with the constraints:
	width <= max_width
	height <= max_height	

Do i and j have to be equal?

Is max_width constrained to be min_width plus some multiple of
	width_increment? 
If no, is the max_width a supported width?

-ted

Ted Kim                           
UCLA Computer Science Department  Internet: tek@penzance.cs.ucla.edu
3804C Boelter Hall                UUCP:    ...!{uunet|ucbvax}!cs.ucla.edu!tek
Los Angeles, CA 90024		  Phone:   (213) 206-8696