Path: utzoo!utgpu!CUNYVM!IBMTCP-L Date: Fri, 23 Feb 90 07:34:24 EST Reply-To: IBM TCP/IP For VM List Sender: IBM TCP/IP For VM List From: Don Smith Subject: SNALINK performance To: UofToronto LAN redistribution Message-ID: <90Feb23.092412est.58762@ugw.utcs.utoronto.ca> Newsgroups: list.ibmtcp-l Distribution: ut Approved: devnull@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu Item of interest: PING times via SNALINK 3090-600E with VM platform PINGing the CRMVS platform using SNA VTAM x-domain. VM platform PINGing ISOVAX (8600) and GRUMPY (Sun) via BTI/ETHERnet over VITALINK bridge at (384K) to the Lab ETHERnet backbone. What kind of SNALINK performance are others seeing ?? R; T=0.01/0.01 08:17:56 ping isovax (count 10 Ping R1.2.1: Pinging host ISOVAX (3.1.4.40). Enter #CP EXT to interrupt. PING: Ping #1 response took 0.036 seconds. Successes so far 1. PING: Ping #2 response took 0.039 seconds. Successes so far 2. PING: Ping #3 response took 0.034 seconds. Successes so far 3. PING: Ping #4 response took 0.033 seconds. Successes so far 4. PING: Ping #5 response took 0.033 seconds. Successes so far 5. PING: Ping #6 response took 0.035 seconds. Successes so far 6. PING: Ping #7 response took 0.035 seconds. Successes so far 7. PING: Ping #8 response took 0.035 seconds. Successes so far 8. PING: Ping #9 response took 0.034 seconds. Successes so far 9. PING: Ping #10 response took 0.034 seconds. Successes so far 10. R; T=0.03/0.09 08:18:11 ping crmvs (count 10 Ping R1.2.1: Pinging host CRMVS (3.1.52.1). Enter #CP EXT to interrupt. PING: Ping #1 response took 0.408 seconds. Successes so far 1. PING: Ping #2 response took 0.239 seconds. Successes so far 2. PING: Ping #3 response took 0.397 seconds. Successes so far 3. PING: Ping #4 response took 0.298 seconds. Successes so far 4. PING: Ping #5 response took 0.388 seconds. Successes so far 5. PING: Ping #6 response took 0.369 seconds. Successes so far 6. PING: Ping #7 response took 0.400 seconds. Successes so far 7. PING: Ping #8 response took 0.397 seconds. Successes so far 8. PING: Ping #9 response took 0.400 seconds. Successes so far 9. PING: Ping #10 response took 0.389 seconds. Successes so far 10. R; T=0.03/0.09 08:18:38 ping grumpy (count 10 Ping R1.2.1: Pinging host GRUMPY (3.1.5.243). Enter #CP EXT to interrupt. PING: Ping #1 response took 0.056 seconds. Successes so far 1. PING: Ping #2 response took 0.042 seconds. Successes so far 2. PING: Ping #3 response took 0.040 seconds. Successes so far 3. PING: Ping #4 response took 0.042 seconds. Successes so far 4. PING: Ping #5 response took 0.043 seconds. Successes so far 5. PING: Ping #6 response took 0.046 seconds. Successes so far 6. PING: Ping #7 response took 0.041 seconds. Successes so far 7. PING: Ping #8 response took 0.041 seconds. Successes so far 8. PING: Ping #9 response took 0.038 seconds. Successes so far 9. PING: Ping #10 response took 0.038 seconds. Successes so far 10. R; T=0.03/0.08 08:19:15 cp sp con stop Don Smith-GE/CIT-CCS