Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!mcdchg!ditka!teraida!vsi1!daver!llustig!xanadu!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!stiatl!meo
From: meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: TALK.PHILOSOPHY.OBJECTIVISM
Keywords: Objectivism, newsgroup, science
Message-ID: <8750@stiatl.UUCP>
Date: 28 Jan 90 18:21:52 GMT
Organization: Sales Technologies Inc., "The Little Shop of Horrors..."
Lines: 21

dschein@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Dinah B. Schein) writes:
|	Thinking that it is best to post my vote publicly, I stand firmly
|in favor of SCI.philosophy.Objectivism.  As has already been explained on
|here, philosophy is indeed a science.  No one's screams to the contrary
|will change this fact.  

This begins to sound like talk.abortion. Properly, I should follow up
by screaming back, "As has already been explained on
here, philosophy is indeed NOT a science.  No one's screams to the contrary
will change this fact."

Which, of course, proves neither less nor more than the original posting.

The man asked for EMAIL'd votes. Is this such an emotional/religious issue
that you react thusly? You can't be *objective* enough to email your vote
and then carry on the discussion here?

Dinah - I'm not singling you out. You are neither the first nor the worst
offender.

-Miles