Xref: utzoo alt.flame:15875 news.groups:18216
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rutgers!rochester!rit!cci632!ccicpg!dave
From: dave@ccicpg.UUCP ( Dave Hill)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,news.groups
Subject: Re: Various topics
Summary: horseshit
Message-ID: <59869@ccicpg.UUCP>
Date: 23 Feb 90 07:17:52 GMT
References: <59198@ccicpg.UUCP> <K5-+QD&@splut.conmicro.com> <59506@ccicpg.UUCP> <38952@apple.Apple.COM>
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: ccicpg
Lines: 30

In article <38952@apple.Apple.COM>, chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes:
> dave@ccicpg.UUCP ( Dave Hill) writes:
> 
> >Then Peter goes and whips up (without discussion OR vote )
> >REC.aquaria.
> 
> Fact: There was discussion. Fact: there was a vote. Fact: this vote and
> discussion were validated by the very same newsgroup administrators who
> validated Richard's group.

Horseshit.  There was NO discussion.  There WAS a discussion about
the fact that there was NO discussion.  You maintained that the
discussion about sci.aquaria had been enough to cover the REC group.

There was NO vote.  You called a POLL.  You LATER started calling
your POLL a VOTE.  Many many people did not participate in your
POLL simply because they felt it was a complete waste of time,
really silly, and in very very poor taste.

Now that Richard is (temporarily) off the net you seem to be
pulling out all the stops to KILL sci.aquaria.  So what's
your problem?  Why all the phony attempts at looking legitimate?
You created rec.aquaria OUTSIDE the guidelines, why bother to
stay in them now?  Have some juevos, son:  RMgroup the sucker.
That's what you want to do isn't it?  That's what you've been
trying to do for MONTHS now.  Either stop your whining and do
it or stop your whining and don't do it.


	Dave