Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!rutgers!rochester!rit!cci632!ccicpg!dave From: dave@ccicpg.UUCP ( Dave Hill) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Aquaria Summary: oh Message-ID: <59874@ccicpg.UUCP> Date: 23 Feb 90 07:34:12 GMT References: Organization: ccicpg Lines: 25 In article , jeffd@ficc.uu.net (Jeff Daiell) writes: > > > Like, if the group were in the right domain, there would be no > controversy. Like, if the vote hadn't smelled, there might still > have been no controversy afterward. Just what I like, an unbiased opinion. And tell me, jeff, why ISN'T sci.aquaria in the right domain? No fair asking Peter, you try to answer this one yourself. > So, as suggested before, why don't we, like, either take a > head-to-head vote, like, or rmgroup con.aquaria and better > propagate rec.aquaria, or rename, like, sci.aquaria > sci.icthyology? Oh REAL unbiased. Con.aquaria? You must have been up all night thinking up with that one. What's wrong with just leaving things alone? The rec people have their fish group, the hard core have their sci group... HEY!! It looks like things are solved already!!! Dave